Inhalt |
This course will provide an introduction to the latest breakthroughs in the methods of contemporary analytic philosophy, with a focus on conceptual engineering.
Conceptual engineering is an exciting new movement in contemporary analytic philosophy that focuses on how best to assess and improve our concepts. Philosophers have been doing this for a long time, but the recent excitement is over thinking explicitly about it. The basic idea behind conceptual engineering is that some of our concepts are deficient, either on theoretical or on practical grounds, and therefore need to be revised, replaced, or eliminated in order to avoid their detrimental effects. For instance, one may consider that the concept of sex has been aptly replaced, in the social context, by that of gender in order to make sense of and fight against the many persistent inequalities of our social reality. A key feature of conceptual engineering is thus its normative agenda: conceptual engineers aim to prescribe the concepts we ought to have and use, rather than merely describing the concepts we do have and use. Drawing on various theoretical accounts about the nature of language, thought, or reality, research in conceptual engineering has now built strong connections to nearly every field across analytic philosophy. In less than a decade, it has become a major topic at the cutting edge of research in philosophy, whose attraction is still growing with an explosive intensity.
In this course, we will study how conceptual engineering has emerged in reaction to classical methods in analytic philosophy (conceptual analysis and the method of cases), we will explore how conceptual engineering relates to other alternative methods in analytic philosophy (Carnapian explication, experimental philosophy, conceptual genealogy, and ameliorative analysis), and we will engage in current theoretical and applied debates in conceptual engineering, such as: when is a concept deficient? What are good concepts and what are they good for? (How) Can we change a concept? How much control do we have over conceptual changes? What are the practical effects of conceptual engineering? When are we doing conceptual engineering? And so on. Once the method is in place, we will turn to applying conceptual engineering to specific cases of high philosophical, scientific, or political/social significance. Thereby, we will progressively learn to transfer and exercise our philosophical skills in the real world. This will lead to promoting a new vision for philosophy — namely, as an effective tool to make tangible differences in the face of the big issues of our time. |
Lernziele |
• Students should be able to critically engage with the concepts and methods of contemporary analytic philosophy, to use them in their chosen areas of study in phi-losophy, and to apply them to real-world cases.
• Students should be able to integrate information and form complex judgements on the basis of limited or partial information, including reflections on the ethical and social implications related to their area of research in analytic philosophy.
• Students should be able to design, create, and develop original ideas in their cho-sen areas of study in philosophy, and then communicate effectively their arguments and conclusions to a knowledgeable audience in a clear and rigorous manner. |