The reading list is subject to change. • Criado Perez, Caroline (2019). Invisible Women. Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Penguin Random House, UK. Introduction: The Default Male. Pp. 1-29.
• Waylen, Georgina, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and Laurel Weldon. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press. Chapter 1: “Gender and Politics: A Gendered World, a Gendered Discipline”.
• Htun, Mala. (2005). “What it means to study gender and the state.” Politics & Gender 1, No. 1: 157-166.
• Correll, Shelley J. and Cecilia L. Ridgeway (2003). “Expectation States Theory.” Pp. 29-51 in the Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. (You can read only Pp. 29-34, 36-39 (empirical evidence), 39 (Behavioural interchange patterns and performance expectations), and 46-48).
• Ridgeway CL. 2014. Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review. 79:1–16.
• Jackson, M., & Cox, D. R. (2013). The Principles of Experimental Design and Their Application in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-14544
• McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 31–61.
• Rivera, Laurie A. (2017). When Two Bodies Are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring, American Sociological Review 82(6): 1111- 1138.
• Correll S.J., Benard, S., and Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?, American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1297-1338.
• Connell, R. (2016). "Masculinities in global perspective: Hegemony, contestation, and changing structures of power," Theory and Society (45) 4: 303-318.
• DiMuccio, S.H., Knowles, E.D. Something to Prove? Manhood Threats Increase Political Aggression Among Liberal Men. Sex Roles 88, 240–267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01349-x
• Krauss, W. R. (1974). Political Implications of Gender Roles: A Review of the Literature. American Political Science Review, 68(4), 1706–1723. doi:10.2307/1959952
• Sanbonmatsu, K. (2002). Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088412
• Bos, A. L., Greenlee, J. S., Holman, M. R., Oxley, Z. M., & Lay, J. C. (2022). This One’s for the Boys: How Gendered Political Socialization Limits Girls’ Political Ambition and Interest. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 484–501. doi:10.1017/S0003055421001027
• Correll, J. Shelley (2001). Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self Assessments. American Journal of Sociology 106(6): 1691-1730. © (2001) ASA
• Thomsen, Danielle M., and Aaron S. King. 2020. “Women’s Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 989–1000.
• Celis, K. Substantive Representation of Women (and Improving it): What it is and should be About?. Comp Eur Polit 7, 95–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.35
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2006) “Intersectionality and feminist politics”, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3): 193-209.
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. and Tamar Kricheli-Katz (2013). Intersecting Cultural Beliefs in Social Relations: Gender, Race, and Class Binds and Freedoms. Gender & Society 27(3): 294–318.
|